<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How dangerous is an anorak?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.euobserver.com/waterfield/2009/04/20/how-dangerous-is-an-anorak/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.euobserver.com/waterfield/2009/04/20/how-dangerous-is-an-anorak/</link>
	<description>Bruno Waterfield has been Brussels correspondent for The Daily Telegraph since December 2006. He has been reporting on the EU and European affairs since 2000, first from Westminster and then from Brussels since January 2003.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 08:20:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: al</title>
		<link>http://blogs.euobserver.com/waterfield/2009/04/20/how-dangerous-is-an-anorak/comment-page-1/#comment-1850</link>
		<dc:creator>al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.euobserver.com/waterfield/?p=59#comment-1850</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#commentbody-210&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-210&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Duncan&lt;/a&gt; :&lt;/strong&gt; Bruno, can I ask a question?
Why on earth do you insist on doing these stupid “bendy banana” style stories? Why is your writing style on this blog more akin to a UKIP member than to a serious journalist?
There are plenty of things which are genuinely wrong with the EU and a lot of good would be done if journalists addressed those issues and wrote about them in an objective manner and provided genuine constructive criticism. But no - let’s write about anoraks instead, let’s bring up the bogeyman of health and safety yet again instead of focusing on real issues.
Put bluntly, these kind of articles and the attitudes of people who read them uncritically make me genuinely embarrassed to be British.
 &lt;/blockquote&gt;Yet you fail to point out what&#039;s &quot;wrong with the EU&quot; that&#039;s more worthy of reportage, instead resorting to nothing but rhetorical statements.

This &lt;b&gt;is&lt;/b&gt; very worthy of being pointed out. Onerous regulation upon regulation for no reason whatsoever &#151; and especially for false reasons &#151; means that the EU intends to wield power &lt;i&gt;instead of&lt;/i&gt; protect its citizens. It is also a bigger indicator of how much control the EU has over the global market, by forcing conformity to an &lt;i&gt;arbitrary standard not based on anything,&lt;/i&gt; never mind any kind of scientific data (which is not cited, presuming its existence). If you cannot see what the political ramifications of this are, then perhaps you need to read some history books.

Mr Waterfield is the reporter; you are not. What are your journalistic qualifications that give you the moral high ground of what to post on a blog or write for a newspaper? Instead, you attack while suggesting no alternative. You make comparisons with the UKIP without considering what validity might be to them (a party that has raised its profile in the recent EU election, to boot); perhaps you should worry more about the genuine dangerous presences in the EU, such as Berlusconi&#039;s neo-Fascists, Germany&#039;s NDP, Austria and Hungary&#039;s neo-Nazis, and even the &lt;b&gt;BNP&lt;/b&gt; (who got a seat on the EP)? Perhaps you have always been ashamed of being British...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="#commentbody-210"><p>
<strong><a href="#comment-210" rel="nofollow">Duncan</a> :</strong> Bruno, can I ask a question?<br />
Why on earth do you insist on doing these stupid “bendy banana” style stories? Why is your writing style on this blog more akin to a UKIP member than to a serious journalist?<br />
There are plenty of things which are genuinely wrong with the EU and a lot of good would be done if journalists addressed those issues and wrote about them in an objective manner and provided genuine constructive criticism. But no &#8211; let’s write about anoraks instead, let’s bring up the bogeyman of health and safety yet again instead of focusing on real issues.<br />
Put bluntly, these kind of articles and the attitudes of people who read them uncritically make me genuinely embarrassed to be British.
 </p></blockquote>
<p>Yet you fail to point out what&#8217;s &#8220;wrong with the EU&#8221; that&#8217;s more worthy of reportage, instead resorting to nothing but rhetorical statements.</p>
<p>This <b>is</b> very worthy of being pointed out. Onerous regulation upon regulation for no reason whatsoever &#8212; and especially for false reasons &#8212; means that the EU intends to wield power <i>instead of</i> protect its citizens. It is also a bigger indicator of how much control the EU has over the global market, by forcing conformity to an <i>arbitrary standard not based on anything,</i> never mind any kind of scientific data (which is not cited, presuming its existence). If you cannot see what the political ramifications of this are, then perhaps you need to read some history books.</p>
<p>Mr Waterfield is the reporter; you are not. What are your journalistic qualifications that give you the moral high ground of what to post on a blog or write for a newspaper? Instead, you attack while suggesting no alternative. You make comparisons with the UKIP without considering what validity might be to them (a party that has raised its profile in the recent EU election, to boot); perhaps you should worry more about the genuine dangerous presences in the EU, such as Berlusconi&#8217;s neo-Fascists, Germany&#8217;s NDP, Austria and Hungary&#8217;s neo-Nazis, and even the <b>BNP</b> (who got a seat on the EP)? Perhaps you have always been ashamed of being British&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrry bear</title>
		<link>http://blogs.euobserver.com/waterfield/2009/04/20/how-dangerous-is-an-anorak/comment-page-1/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>chrry bear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 21:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.euobserver.com/waterfield/?p=59#comment-278</guid>
		<description>It seems to me, the european bureacrats are smoking corn or too strong stuff. What they are really doing? They must be completely bannana, or they pretend IQ of 60.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me, the european bureacrats are smoking corn or too strong stuff. What they are really doing? They must be completely bannana, or they pretend IQ of 60.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.euobserver.com/waterfield/2009/04/20/how-dangerous-is-an-anorak/comment-page-1/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.euobserver.com/waterfield/?p=59#comment-210</guid>
		<description>Bruno, can I ask a question?

Why on earth do you insist on doing these stupid &quot;bendy banana&quot; style stories? Why is your writing style on this blog more akin to a UKIP member than to a serious journalist?

There are plenty of things which are genuinely wrong with the EU and a lot of good would be done if journalists addressed those issues and wrote about them in an objective manner and provided genuine constructive criticism. But no - let&#039;s write about anoraks instead, let&#039;s bring up the bogeyman of health and safety yet again instead of focusing on real issues.

Put bluntly, these kind of articles and the attitudes of people who read them uncritically make me genuinely embarrassed to be British.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruno, can I ask a question?</p>
<p>Why on earth do you insist on doing these stupid &#8220;bendy banana&#8221; style stories? Why is your writing style on this blog more akin to a UKIP member than to a serious journalist?</p>
<p>There are plenty of things which are genuinely wrong with the EU and a lot of good would be done if journalists addressed those issues and wrote about them in an objective manner and provided genuine constructive criticism. But no &#8211; let&#8217;s write about anoraks instead, let&#8217;s bring up the bogeyman of health and safety yet again instead of focusing on real issues.</p>
<p>Put bluntly, these kind of articles and the attitudes of people who read them uncritically make me genuinely embarrassed to be British.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Europabloggen.no &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hemmelig trening av EU-diplomater</title>
		<link>http://blogs.euobserver.com/waterfield/2009/04/20/how-dangerous-is-an-anorak/comment-page-1/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Europabloggen.no &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hemmelig trening av EU-diplomater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.euobserver.com/waterfield/?p=59#comment-208</guid>
		<description>[...] forbyr &#8220;livsfarlige&#8221; anorakker for barn. &#8220;Det er et mirakel at vår generasjon overlevde barndommen uten en slik lov,&#8221; uttalte [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] forbyr &#8220;livsfarlige&#8221; anorakker for barn. &#8220;Det er et mirakel at vår generasjon overlevde barndommen uten en slik lov,&#8221; uttalte [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

