I Am that I Am


Lukashenka goes for the West. That’s what Russian press understood from his working visit to Vilnius on September’16. First time since 1998 he went to Lithuania and – to EU.

But no, he is not going to take sides between Russia and EU.

While in Vilnius he was talking about the importance of the relations with Brussels and Belarus’ contribution into European security. He said Minsk was not going to make any special moves to impress the West to have the sanctions lifted: if EU wanted to improve relations and have a dialogue, it’d just do this.

At the same time he tried to comfort Moscow telling Lithuanian journalists that Belarusian parliament would look into the recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia in October. Underlining Russia is an important partner for Minsk.

Lukashenka repeated the usual things he instructs his ministers with. Interesting enough that the same rhetoric sounds very different outside Belarus.

Back home his quotes are to be written up and analysed, they pave the way for the development of the country. In Vilnius he seemed to be defending his right to be the way he is, to rule the country his way. He went on the defensive simply to be understood.

Love me or leave me, is the message to the EU. You won’t change me but we could try and come to a compromise to normalise relations.

PS

It’s also that Lukashenka was pretty nervous. That’s very understandable: his offices have everything under control in Minsk, when and where everyone goes, they line up journalists and usually decide on the questions.

The change of the situation is clearly seen in his pictures. The limited number of Belarusian photographers who work with the President can take pictures of him only from certain perspectives, afterwards the pictures are edited in Photoshop. In Vilnius any photographer could work almost from any place. And in these pictures Lukashenka looks older, he looks worked out and strained. And by the way, very human.

, , ,

  1. #1 by michael on September 18, 2009 - 12:55 am

    It’s a bit irrelevent but I’m curius : “But no, he is not going to take sides between Russia and EU.”

    why someone have to take sides? Are the eu countries in some kind of war with Russia?

    OK there are some problems, but taking sides?

  2. #2 by valentina pop on September 18, 2009 - 12:57 am

    Here’s a little story from Charlie Wilson’s War, the movie.

    There was a little boy in a village who got a horse on his birthday. “How wonderful,” said the village people. “We’ll see,” said the Zen master. Then the boy learned how to ride the horse and one day he fell off the horse and broke his legs. “How terrible,” said the village people. “We’ll see,” said the Zen master. Then war broke out and all men and young boys were drafted. The boy had to stay home, because his legs were not right. “How good for him,” said the village people. “We’ll see,” said the Zen master..

    I wouldn’t compare Lukashenka to a Zen master..but it seems that if you’re patient enough, you can out-wit the EU…

  3. #3 by Maryna Rakhlei on September 18, 2009 - 5:48 pm

    Michael, no, your question is very relevant.
    You are right saying that “taking sides” might be not the most precise phrase.
    It’s like with the US the political part of the question to delpoy or not to deploy is the interest of Moscow, interest of th States, of Poland and Czech Republic. Considering the security matters, one can’t leave out the political preferences of all parties involved. As you make choice – volens nolens – you take sides as well.
    Or: Choosing the best man for the wedding is not about turning back to the rest of your friends. But it’s still a choice.

    I mean – there’s always choice and partners who won’t be happy with your decision.

  4. #4 by michael on September 18, 2009 - 10:09 pm

    Point taken. On the other hand, maybe Lukashenko just tries to turn his country to another Switzerland, who knows? :)

  5. #5 by al on September 20, 2009 - 2:59 am

    michael : It’s a bit irrelevent but I’m curious : “But no, he is not going to take sides between Russia and EU.”
    why does someone have to take sides? Are the eu countries in some kind of war with Russia?
    OK there are some problems, but taking sides?

    You should read http://www.stratfor.com/analysis/germany_merkels_choice_and_future_europe&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=opera” rel=”nofollow”>this. You’ll get a sense of what has been going on between Russia and the EU since last year.

  6. #6 by yn on October 25, 2009 - 3:00 pm

    @valentina pop
    The only thing a autocrat care about is the power. So donnt prettify him who just another
    cormorant never satisfy his unfulfillable appetency. The Only one he will “outwit” is himself, neither EU nor Russian.

(will not be published)