It’s very likely that from now on the movement of Belarusian authorities towards Brussels’ requirements will be even more visible. The Belarusian president was furious about yesterdays’ remarks of the Russian finance minister Alexei Kudrin who publicly cast doubt on the Belarus’ ability to default on its debt by the end of the year due to the dire state of economy. He warned it was too early to say whether Belarus would receive any further loans from Moscow.
“The future of Belarus can no longer depend on Russia… The days of Minsk bowing down to Moscow are over… Belarus needs to look for its happiness on a different part of the planet.”– announced Lukashenka. And underlined that he was saying this in public consciously.
The escapade came a day after his talks with the Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin in Minsk. Putin who travelled together with Kudrin played a “good cop” and expressed hope that Belarusian-Russian trade kept increasing in the period of the global crisis.
Lukashenka in contrast expressed outrage that Kudrin’s comments had been agreed with Putin and commented that the Russian minister had also fully consolidated with the Belarusian opposition which lived on Western grants and tried to teach the authorities to work. (That’s probably the worst you can say about someone: he is with the opposition!)
The stakes according to Lukashenka are high: “If we don’t stand tall… we are going to be running in a sweat to the right and the left in the hope that someone is going to throw us a piece of bread from the table.”
He mentioned no alternative to Russia. But we have two strong neighbours. And if we don’t bow down to Russia, the movement towards EU could become more visible. The problem is that this visibility is nothing new. So there’s little hope this movement is going to be more effective this time.
#1 by Carl on May 31, 2009 - 12:04 am
Belarus in the EU one day?
#2 by Marcel on May 31, 2009 - 12:34 pm
I certainly hope not, we’d have to give them money and I am against that. Let’s give Belarus to Russia to have as a new province.
#3 by Rob on June 1, 2009 - 8:55 am
We don’t give money for nothing yet, if they are to benefit from EU funds in the future we have our own benefits coming for sure. So far it’s been even-steven game.
#4 by Maryna Rakhlei on June 1, 2009 - 2:46 pm
It’s too early to say. Belarus is a European country and its future is definitely with Europe. But it’s difficult to say when and now how far we could go in harmonising our laws and norms to intergrate with EU politically and economically. But I would prefer the neutral (and prosperous!) status of Switzerland. At least as long as we are politically on (and at) the crossroads
And Belarusian president is sure that for EU and Russia it’s difficult and actually impossible to do without Belarus. That’s why he feels free to act and comment. In the meantime he is the only one to answer your question.. but I’m afriad that every week the reply could be different.
#5 by Maryna Rakhlei on June 1, 2009 - 2:57 pm
Give Belarus to Russia? The scenario of 18-19 centuries. Could you think of something new?
#6 by Maryna Rakhlei on June 1, 2009 - 3:02 pm
Oh yesss. No sentiments, no affection, pure pragmatic attitude to everything. Business as usual.
#7 by Dan on June 2, 2009 - 10:11 pm
Maryna, I suspect (given the choice) most of those living in Europe would:
“prefer the neutral (and prosperous!) status of Switzerland”
to losing all national sovereignty and having meaningless EU citizenship thrust upon them.
#8 by Maryna Rakhlei on June 7, 2009 - 10:56 am
Hm but at least they are not to choose between two unions.
#9 by yn on October 25, 2009 - 2:25 pm
@Dan
“meaningless EU citizenship” ? what’ a laughable thought.
Do you think you can keep your national sovereignty after been annexed by
russian empire? you definetely don’t know your
history. At least you can say you are a Belarusian with EU citizenship!