If EU policymakers and companies are not going to go to Caspian energy producers with serious offers for their hydrocarbons, Caspian producers will just have to come to the EU. That seems to be the message being sent by Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan as their state energy companies partner to build an oil pipeline heading West-ward. Plans for the so-called Baku-Black Sea pipeline were announced at the Atlantic Council’s Black Sea Energy and Economic Forum in Bucharest on Oct. 2 by Vitaliy Baylarbayov, Deputy Vice President of SOCAR, the state oil company of Azerbaijan. Kazakhstan’s KazMunaiGas and SOCAR will build the new route to connect Kazakhstan’s increasing oil shipments across the Caspian to tankers in the Black Sea, which will likely disgorge their black gold in Romania to be fed into the planned Pan-European Pipeline (PEOP) from Constanta to Trieste. Rompetrol is one of the major European companies that could contribute to the PEOP project, and KazMunaiGas just bought 100% of Rompetrol. In the face of EU reticence about engaging the countries of the Caspian for fear of angering Russia, Kazakhstan has effectively arranged for its own delivery of oil to South-Central Europe.
When it comes to Caspian oil, the mountain has come to Mohammed. But European decision-makers cannot expect the same to happen for the Caspian’s far more strategic resource: natural gas. Not only is it the EU that is desperately in need of alternative sources of gas to diversify away from dangerous dependence on Russia, but the biggest gas player in the Caspian, Turkmenistan, has a strict policy of only selling its gas on its borders. Turkmenistan’s Director of the State Agency for Management and use of Hydrocarbon Resources, Yagshygeldi Kakaev, underscored that point at the Bucharest Forum, amongst counterparts from Bulgaria, Georgia, Romania and Turkey. In practice, this means that Western companies would have to build a Trans-Caspian gas pipeline from Baku to Turkmenbashi, on the Caspian’s eastern shore, to connect with the planned Nabucco line to Central Europe. China, the EU’s primary competitor for Turkmen resources, has almost finished its own pipeline across Central Asia to Turkmenistan’s borders, and despite a dispute with Ashgabat, Russia will seek to resume importing Turkmen gas in early 2010, some of which will be resold in Europe for inflated prices.
Kazakhstan has taken the initiative to string together its own pipeline network. Azerbaijan is positioning itself as a key energy producer and pivotal transit bottleneck between the Black and Caspian seas. Turkey is busy signing contract after contract to live up to its name as the world’s largest energy hub. Turkmenistan is courting consumers in Iran and South Asia, while Russia and China muscle in. The EU’s neighboring energy players are busy. Only Europe, the beggar, not the chooser in Eurasia’s energy game, is inactive. While the Lisbon Treaty and a new EU Commission have drawn the Union’s attention inward, neither Brussels, nor European capitals should expect to have their energy security handed to them.
#1 by Andria on October 16, 2009 - 6:35 am
In such cases of High Politics, we always experience the clumsiness of the EU structure and the victory of the intergovernmentalism over functionalism.
EU is good in agricultural and economical fields, but while while working on the foreign and security policies, sovereign states never compromise and there we have 27 of them.
Maybe it needs new governing body, something like security council which will ensure effective and active political involvement in this kind of matters like Energy issues, relations with Russia and so on.
Weak point is that this will decrease the level of democracy in the EU.
#2 by Herta Wolf on October 17, 2009 - 5:46 pm
Andria,
QUOTE: “EU is good in agricultural .. fields”
Ignoring the pun (agricultural fields) I’m staggered by this comment. CAP has not been a success for the EU! Are you French by any chance?
#3 by Ivan Kalburov on October 19, 2009 - 1:21 pm
@Andria
This is exactly the problem in my opinion. Energy should be brought back to a technical issue with more economic rather than geopolitical elements to it!
We have leverage to change poltiical will in the EU or political attitudes in Russia that is close to zero. Therefore, not a council but a single regulatory EU energy agency is needed. Full liberalization of the gas market, and increased connections between national infrastructure networks so they become a single European network, regulated by single European energy policy.
If this happens, the EU would gain more clout in negotiations, Russia will not be able to divide Europe any more, and the deficits and excesses in Europe will be managed much smarter. THen we can build more pipelines and talk about diversification. But first, bring energy among the technical policies again where its place is!
#4 by Voeding on May 15, 2010 - 9:33 am
@Herta Wolf
Well, i thought people have rights to speech about what he/she thoughts doesn’t matter he/she is a french or not as long as he’s thought doesn’t harm each other. For some point i agree with Andria.