We must not make the mistake and think that countries cannot go belly up. Why? Well, frankly because they can.
Argentina (2001) may be the best-known recent example, but it sure is not the only example. Russia (1998), Ecuador (1999), Ukraine (1998 and 2000) and Indonesia and Pakistan (both in 1999) are just a few others.
True, those are all non-Western countries. But again, this does not mean the Western world is somehow immune to the bankruptcy virus. Why? Again, because frankly it is not. It is just that in our lifetime no Western country has defaulted on its debt. But look beyond the last three decades or so and it immediately becomes crystal clear that the Western world is just as prone to default as any other part of the world.
Italy, Poland and Rumania – all three EU member states nowadays and even euro area members (Italy) – have defaulted on their debt. Italy did that in 1940, so one could relate that to the onset of the Second World War, but Poland and Rumania both defaulted in 1981. Even Germany has defaulted, in the first part of the last century, via hyperinflation in that country.
The Greek way
Greece itself – the reason for me writing this column is of course the euro crisis – is also a good example. The Hellenic Republic has been in default for a large part of its modern history as an independent country. If it was not for the EU, other euro area member states, the European Central Bank and the International Monetary Funds, Greece would have defaulted once again months if not years ago.
Admittedly, that was Greece from before the European monetary union not the new Greece. But let us take a look at that modern Greece.
On every measure and even working with the uber-optimistic assumptions about economic growth in the years to come, the Greek national debt is not sustainable. The debt is increasing further because Athens in not able to balance its budget. Yawning deficits are forecasted for a long time.
The country cannot export its way out of these dire straits as a decade of too fast wage increases without accompanying productivity leaps has left the country’s companies uncompetitive. It will take just as long, in the best case, to solve that problem. Sadly, time is not a luxury Greece has.
Fighting
The average Greek meanwhile is not working but demonstrating and fighting in the streets and when they are not on the streets, the Greeks are moving their savings out of their own country and into the Swiss franc, gold, basically everything non-Greek.
The country’s economy shows closer resemblance with an ever-larger number of third world countries than with its euro partners. There is not much hope (or should I say none whatsoever) that the economy will surprise us all in a positive way any time soon.
In short, bar some deus et machina event (like the rest of the euro area giving Greece an gift of some 300 odd billion euro to pay off its debts, something that is even less likely to happen than the French government holding a meeting in English for example) Greece, and maybe Portugal as well, will default sooner or later.
The sooner the other European political decision makers acknowledge that, the better. Because only when they do so, they could be ´accused of´ being realistic and only then one would have reason to be optimistic about euro area surviving in the medium and long term.
Answer around the corner (sometimes literally)
European political decision makers need not look far for an answer to the question what to do. Every town, city or sometimes even a village in Europe has the answer as every town, city and sometimes even a village in Europe has its own fire department.
Fire department? Yes, indeed. What do the firemen do when they arrive at, let us say, burning house that is beyond saving? They pour millions of liters of water, sometimes for hours and hours, on neighboring properties in order to save them.
This is what Europe needs to do:
First, accept the fact that Greece and probably Portugal as well, is too big a mess to save.
Second, expand your emergency fund and use the money to pre-emptively save Spain and Italy (ok perhaps you can try to keep Portugal from falling into the abyss also) thereby saving Europe’s banks as well. Sure, they will feel the pain from Greece going into default, but let us not forget two things that are relevant in this matter.
The first one is that banks, up to a certain point, have gotten themselves into problems. They should have paid more attention to the real situation on the ground in Greece and assessed the possible risks involved when buying Greek bonds instead of treating the Greek bonds as Bunds with funny looking letters on them.
Second, Europe has been saving Greece for over a year now. The ECB has been buying Greek bonds as well. Every prudent bank has used that time to lower its exposure to Greece. Those banks that have not or even have increased their exposure (betting Europe will never let Greece fail and thus pocketing some very, very nice returns (2 year Greek bond come with almost 30 percent interest rate nowadays) well, they basically deserve to get burned.
#1 by Lawrence on June 23, 2011 - 5:50 pm
Not only Greece and Portugal, but Ireland, Spain and Italy are to follow in the not too distant future.
It’s about time politicians stop taking the people for a ride.
Neither the euro nor the eu can be saved whatever they do and when they fail they are going to fail forever.
#2 by Emil on June 24, 2011 - 8:36 am
… did not know Rumania defaulted in 1981 … It was a temporary suspension of payments, afaik.
Germany defaulted several times this century: 1923 via hyperinflation, 1931, 1945 (default on sizable war debts to allies), 1953 (default on war debt owed to winners, payment delayed till “reunification”), 1990 (refused to pay the war debt after unification) …
#3 by Betterworld on June 25, 2011 - 12:50 am
Its the contagion, stupid (sorry don’t mean to be pejorative , blame Bill Clinton for the phraseology).
The Americans can’t risk the contagion of a run on the German banks sending a shockwave back across the Atlantic that is why they are so exercised about stopping it as far away from their shores as possible, regardless of the cost.
Make no doubt about it, if a Greek default (which technically has already happened) causes a European bank to collapse given the gearing in the system, that will causes a insurer of the credit default swaps it has purchased to collapse (most likely in London). Once that happens, all bets are off.
The real default the markets are afraid of is not a Greek default, or a Portuguese default, but a US sovereign default. And that will happen if the credit default swaps underpinning any of the banks holding Greek debt are based in the USA. Each stage of the collapse process takes out a bigger institution because of the gearing involved. The last guy standing is the US Federal Reserve and by the time it gets to them, the numbers will be too big to bail out. The contagion is not linear, its exponential.
And all of that’s only a European bank run away.
A handful of communists in Greece have the whole capitalist system in their cross hairs. We just don’t know if their gun is loaded.
#4 by One of a handful of Greek communists on June 27, 2011 - 5:49 pm
What an excellent idea, Mr Mujagic! I fully back your proposal!
The so-called EU-IMF ‘bail-out’ is a complete and utter disaster and has been ruining my country for over two years. If they let us default, things will get tough in the short-term but in some years we will be able to recover, as most countries eventually do after a default. Anyway, I can’t imagine anything worse happening to us in case of a deafult and exit from the eurozone than what will happen to us if they keep ‘saving’ us. In this case, the medicine is just as awful as the disease it is supposed to fight. Plus, I don’t see any prospect of recovery if we keep taking the medicine.
Now, in the event that a Greek default triggers a catastrophic collapse process that will take down the eurozone and, eventually, the entire capitalist system, then I cannot think of a better reason why Greece MUST default. It will be the gratest gift that Greece and Europe ever made to civilization!
#5 by Marcel on June 28, 2011 - 1:31 pm
Greece would be better off after default. The democracy hating pro-EU crowd is just lying, scaremongering and using goebbelsian propaganda to try and pretend the reverse is true.
The democracy hating EU-philes are terrified Greece would be better off, as others would leave too and their dreams of destroying national parliamentary democracy would lay in ruins. This is why they refuse to acknowledge reality. This is why they are willing to destroy our wealth to prop up their antidemocratic project.
#6 by Joe on July 12, 2011 - 4:57 pm
In this respect, you are entirely correct. Concider that miracle, the Deutsche Wirschaftswunder. It’s a direct result of getting rid of the reparations in the Versaille treaty. Germany could not affort to pay the UK and France. They borrowed money from US banks to repay the UK and FR. Later on Hitler refused to pay on those loans. They remained in place after the war.
Bzzt! Sorry, wrong. It will do more to reduce government’s capacity to “do socialism” than it could even do now. The only options you seem to be looking for here are totalitarian control of society and economy (which produces poverty and misery,) or lawless chaos wherin people adapt to the individual merchantilistic society that matures into markets, and optimally into free markets.
My notion is that you might have fantasies about the prior, but know better, and have a well of hatred for the letter, but know better.
What do YOU propose in that apocalypic world where there is no wealth to redistribute? Force the urban dwellers to collective farms in the countryside a la Pol Pot?
Forgive me for not wanting to help a Marxist-Leninist who does not want to pay back money borrowed to essencially hand out to the proletariat. It’s a contracdiction of the very principel espoused, as I know it having lived in “real, living Socialism” in the DDR.
The impulse to make oneself the overlord who extracts without merit the wealth of others exhibits a lack of knowledge of those priciples, and resembles over-emotional anarchism, which is and was the enemy of Communism itself, as it is little more than personal bombast with a desire to have an unearned controll of others. Despite what you’ve been lead to believe, Communism means simply that if you don’t work, you don’t eat. It was illegal to be unemployed, and the only charity available was from what was left of the churches who were being squeezed out of existence themselves.
Onanistic present-day fantasy-communists want to be compensated well and not in line with ones’ actual effort or the value of labor, or frequently NOT WORK, but eat anyway. The reasoning those who believe this give themselves is that they are stabbing the enemy in the gut by doing this. To the contrary: they are looking for something for nothing. In theory, this freeloader is their foe.
Communism is meant to distribute social risk equally. The worker takes virtually NO risk compared to the employer in our present day world. What’s sadder is that the fantasy-communist what’s BOTH the worker and empolyer to fund the absolution of THEIR social risk.