There’s no accounting for politics. It can make even the best laid plans go awry. The Berlin-driven fiscal discipline treaty was completed on Monday. A delighted Angela Merkel, German Chancellor, praised the “very successful outcome” of the summit. But the very same document looks set to become a football in France’s April presidential elections. Socialist candidate Francois Hollande, leading in the polls, appears intent on making the presidential election a de facto referendum on the treaty.
By the time French elections come about – the first round is on 22 April – the treaty will have been signed by President Nicolas Sarkozy but not ratified by parliament.
Hollande has promised to renegotiate the treaty if he wins. “If he is elected, he will ask for the renegotiation of this treaty to complete it and rebalance it … to get Europe out of its spiral of austerity,” his campaign manager Pierre Moscovici said Tuesday. Indeed, Hollande, who would be the first Socialist president in 17 years, has said his first trip abroad if he wins would be to Berlin.
He wants more focus on growth and has spoken out in favour of a greater role for the European Central Bank and the creation of eurobonds. Good – he is in campaign mode. He can say what he likes without being constrained by the political realities of a) office or b) the wishes of other member states.
Still, the latest opinion poll gives him 31 percent support. Sarkozy – who has yet to declare his candidacy – has 24.5 percent. Sarkozy’s camp are saying it is not possible to renegotiate after the president’s signature. Certainly it would be difficult and it would depend on what other member states (many of whom – Italy, Spain, Lisbon, Athens, Dublin – need Berlin) say.
But the Socialists have had a similar such experience in the past. In 1997 they kicked up a fuss about the stability pact – the rules underpinning the euro – and threatened to renegotiate it. Eventually they won some small concessions including having the pact named the stability and growth pact.
(Technically, France does not have to ratify the fiscal compact for it to come into force elsewhere. It goes into effect once 12 of the 17 eurozone countries have ratified it. Politically, of course, is another matter entirely. France refusing to ratify the treaty would poison relations between Paris and Berlin. Hollow out the point of the treaty as France has a long record of high public spending. And cause more uncertainty in the markets.)
Merkel has been pushing the treaty saying that a fiscal discipline pact will calm markets – not to say her backbenchers – but there are real fears that its belt-tightening focus may compound Europe’s economic misery. And French people are already jittery. Unemployment is at its highest rate in 12 years. Tough austerity measures have been taken. More will come. Hollande’s anti-treaty rhetoric may well strike a scapegoat chord.
In that sense, Merkel’s remarkable offer to make campaign appearances with Sarkozy is very tricky. Sarkozy, assuming he runs, will have to judge whether Merkel is good for his image or whether the German chancellor becomes associated in French voters’ minds with austerity and job loss.
#1 by french derek on February 1, 2012 - 7:54 pm
I agree with your analysis, Honor; however, things are never so clear-cut in elections (especially here in France).
The latest polls show the French trust Sarkozy on the economic crisis more than they do Hollande. Also, even though he trails in the polls, you shouldn’t write off Bayrou. He not only supports the new treaty but what it includes – essentially the “golden rule” over budgetary balance. For me, a man to watch.
#2 by Marcel on February 1, 2012 - 11:31 pm
Sarkozy’s camp are saying it is not possible to renegotiate after the president’s signature. Certainly it would be difficult and it would depend on what other member states (many of whom – Italy, Spain, Lisbon, Athens, Dublin – need Berlin) say.
Here in a nutshell why the Eurosoviet Union is undemocratic. A national ‘demos’ cannot even force changes in its own national law once a Eurosoviet treaty is signed. Where’s the democracy here?
#3 by french derek on February 2, 2012 - 6:48 pm
Marcel: it is long-standing diplomatic practice that international treaties, once signed, are observed by all subsequent governments of the signing countries. That goes for EU treaties just as much as much as others.
The breaking of an international treaty has often been the prelude to war.
#4 by Marcel on February 2, 2012 - 10:17 pm
Not if an unpopular government does it at the last moment when it knows its out of the door, just to spite the incoming new government. You should be able to pull out of treaties at any time. Especially those of the undemocratic Eurosoviet Union which are usually aimed at destroying democracy.
#5 by french derek on February 4, 2012 - 7:23 pm
Marcel, if you are completely up-to date with French presidential news you will know that Hollande is now hedging his bets. Now, he’s saying that he hopes (note that word) to be able to influence the way in which the treaty is built upon. Not quite the same as “renegotiation”?
Your view that the EU is undemocratic might be felt as a hard blow by those elected to office there. Only the Commissioners are “unelected” – and for a purpose: they must hold to a non-partisan line. In this they are different from the Council and the Parliament – all elected (by you and me, or at least in our names).
#6 by Betterworld on February 5, 2012 - 12:31 am
The French are labouring under a misunderstanding if they think it matters who they elect.
The current Irish Minister for Transport, Leo Varadkar, campaigned in advance of the recent general election with the promise of “not a red cent more” for the banks. He was duely elected.
Last week the government of which he is a minister paid €1.5billion over to a bankrupt private bank, on the insistence of the ECB, allegedly so as not to cause a run on the big German banks who had irresponsibly lent the funds to the small Irish bank in the first instance.
Is this the nature of 21st century European democracy?
Thank you Mrs Merkel. Your devotion to the Fatherland is established Uber Alles.
#7 by monikass on February 11, 2012 - 4:20 pm
marocmariages.com est un site interessant pour le mariage au maroc: vous trouvez
toutes les infos pour bien commencer votres préparatif du mariage :
vous aurez des infos sur negafa- salle de mariage – orchestr – traiteur -DJ/mode/coiffure/décoration…
#8 by casa de madera on April 23, 2012 - 4:40 pm
Total Agree. Think the same Betterworld User: The French are labouring under a misunderstanding if they think it matters who they elect.
#9 by lucie hauri on April 30, 2012 - 12:09 pm
This is a good article. It is nice to read something else.
#10 by timeline facebook on May 2, 2012 - 11:22 am
Sarkozy is not the best president and i don’t think that he will be elected again
#11 by Imóveis on May 17, 2012 - 4:50 am
Yea, is a minister paid €1.5billion over to a bankrupt private bank, on the insistence of the ECB, allegedly so as not to cause a run on the big German banks who had irresponsibly lent the funds to the small Irish bank in the first instance. Thanks!
#12 by Nokia With Price on May 18, 2012 - 9:37 am
Maybe it is good if you try to find out by asking direct and visited the campus in question. So that everything will be much clearer.
#13 by Joana Monteiro on May 23, 2012 - 9:15 pm
I am writing a research paper and collecting information on this topic.Your post is one of the better that I have read.Thank you for putting this information into one location.