Reinvigorating Franco-German relations?


Recently there has been much talk, but little action, on renewing Franco-German relations.

This is largely due to the leaders of the two countries. German Chancellor Angela Merkel and her French counterpart Nicolas Sarkozy are profoundly different in political style and nature. This is evident in their approach to developing Franco-German ties. Paris tends to see Berlin as being standoffish while German officials believe the French are playing at gesture politics.

Sarkozy’s suggestion last year, for example, to have a joint ministry was met with a certain amount of  eye-rolling in Berlin.

There have been several other well-documented differences along the way, not least concerning the best way to tackle the financial and economic crisis.

While it’ll never be a meeting of political minds, lately there have been efforts to work at the relationship. Sarkozy’s attendance at the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall on 9 November followed by Merkel’s trip to the French capital two days later to commemorate Armistice were both hugely symbolic.

Next week, this symbolism is supposed to be backed up by something of substance. French Europe minister Pierre Lellouche and his German counterpart Werner Hoyer have submitted a letter to their political masters containing 16 guidelines and 40 concrete proposals to rejolt the bilateral ties, reports Le Monde. Sarkozy and Merkel are to pick the ones they want to run with and make them public at the next Franco-German council on 4 February.

The suggestions run from diplomacy to the economy to cooperation in science. According to Hoyer the Franco-German relationship “needs to put itself at Europe’s service” and here is Lellouche’s take on the situation in an interview with Le Figaro:

“The reality is that the friendship between our two countries is without equal in Europe or in the rest of the world. If there is no agreement between France and Germany, not a great deal happens in Europe. And when we reach agreement, we draw in everyone. Our two countries don’t have extra rights over others but they have, given history, a particular responsibility to serve Europe. At the beginning of this 21st century, their accord could allow Europe to exist with globalisation. It is not easy because our companies are often in competition and our two countries do not function in the same way. But what is essential is that a willingness exists at the highest level on both sides.”

The EU certainly needs some sort of a shot in the arm. Sidelined at the Copenhagen climate summit, unsure in its response to the economic crisis and only slowly realising that the long-heralded Lisbon Treaty is not a solution in itself but only provides some tools for better policy and external representation, the Union is urgently in need of some internal dynamism.

Some signals that France and Germany will get behind an ambitious plan for the EU’s next ten year economic strategy; will back the EU’s new foreign policy set-up (at the moment its chief diplomat is under fire for her response to the Haiti earthquake) and have further shared ideas for how to emerge from the economic crisis would be a start.

  1. #1 by Anthony on January 25, 2010 - 5:28 pm

    I had imagined the passing of the Lisbon Treaty would be the necessary “shot in the arm” but it seems to have had the opposite effect. More likely the problem lies in the EU’s inability to handle well the massive financial difficulties and economic slump. Greater cooperation, integration and long-term planning is required.

  2. #2 by Clarify on January 25, 2010 - 5:41 pm

    The French and German leadership of today have little resemblance to the Kohl Mitterandt and past leadership sincere sense of political commitment for Europe. In a Europe at 27 they are more and more inward looking and unwilling to spend political capital from their reciprocal countries for the common interest of the Union unless they run the EU Presidency et. al. Whoever has been involved in working on EU issues with both countries for a number of years can immediately see the difference in attitude. This means that eventually the new EU power structure will have to reduce in some ways the specific weight of both countries for a more reliable and altruistic form of power center in the EU decision making apparatus.

  3. #3 by Adam DSD on January 27, 2010 - 5:13 am

    We will a long, long time for “standoffish” German Chancellor and a “gesturing” French counterpart to have a similar “style”. We might as well wait for a British Prime Minister to “love” the EU.

    Even so, let’s just get on with it – and get what needs to be done, done!

  4. #4 by Jean-Baptiste Perrin on January 27, 2010 - 10:22 am

    The reason no other reparations was asked from Germany at the time (and until the final treaty in 1989, endorsing reunification) was to avoid a repetition of the same mistakes which had led to WWII. The Versailles treaty had imposed punitive reparations to post-WWI Germany. This made it impossible for Germany to absorb the impact of the 1929 economic crisis and reinforced the vengefull ideologies of Hitler and his comparses, leading to WWII. The territories lost were indeed (from Polish point of view) a compensation for the USSR invasion of the Eastern areas. However, the unfairness of such an invasion doesn’t mean that Poland should ask reparation from Germany, but, legally speaking, from the USSR (or currently from Belarus).

    As for the populations in question, their support for nazism is no excuse for how they were treated. An eye for an eye does not make justice. It just adds more injustice to a previous one.

    My conclusion is that Poland should look at itself and reform oneself rather than constantly seeking responsibility outside. There is no discussion in my mind that Poland was horribly wronged from the 17th century to the 20th, and by all its neighboors. However, it is not the only country in this case and bitching about it is not going to help.

  5. #5 by Jean-Baptiste Perrin on January 28, 2010 - 11:16 am

    That’s not what I am saying. There simply is a kind of statute of limitation on anything. If Poland wants to reopen the issue of compensations, then it will take the risk of re-opening the border issue. That is specifically what Poland wanted to prevent when the German reunification treaty occured. If Poland wants to reopen that topic, then it also has to claim its territory lost to three different countries. That’s a can of worms that is currently not in the interest of Poland to open. If Poland wishes to question the borders defined at the end of WWII, its place is not in the European Union. You might not like this, but it is a fact. Precedents are dangerous things to create.

    By the way, I am well aware that it is not only Belarus, I was just using this country as an example.

  6. #6 by Eric on June 15, 2011 - 2:49 pm

    France and Germany are two important countries of EU,, they need to act maturely so that their respective nations and EU as a whole prospers and develops.

  7. #7 by Andre on June 22, 2011 - 5:37 pm

    Or as De Gaulle said: “Es lebe Deutschland! Es lebe deutsch-französische Freundschaft”. The good old Hertenstein spirit.

  8. #8 by Manny on September 24, 2011 - 5:51 am

    France and Germany combined are termed as a ‘twin engine’ or ‘core countries.’ This is because they both are prominently interested in further EU integration. However, more seems to be on the paper and the reality is that the action part is on the minimal level. As you rightly stated, this is mainly due to the different in the style and political nature of the leaders of both countries.

    I hope they keep their emotions aside and come forward to strength Franco-German ties for a better tomorrow.

  9. #9 by Tiffany on October 15, 2011 - 4:17 am

    Different political ideas or ideologies most of the time diversifies a certain group of people. Even the best of friends have their own disagreements so I guess there can be ways of uniting these two countries and hopefully the world.

(will not be published)