You could be forgiven for thinking that Michel Barnier will single-handedly be able to bring the City of London to its knees and sink Britain’s economy while he’s at it.
That he will be able to propose and then get legislation on to the member states’ statute books all by himself. And that this is just what he intends to do once he gets his hands on the internal market portfolio early next year.
Paris’ European Commissioner nominee is just that – a nominee to be a European Commissioner. Not France’s commissioner. Not Sarkozy himself. Barnier will be part of a legislative apparatus that includes the parliament and member states.
Yes, Nicolas Sarkozy’s comments about the English being the biggest “losers” in the commission line-up are unnecessarily provocative.
But they say more about the French president, who has a track-record of intemperate comments, than about Barnier’s future intentions on financial regulation. They also are as much about playing to the national gallery and have been reported in French newspapers as such.
Paris and London do have strong – fundamental even – differences over financial regulation. And these will continue to be played out over the coming months – regardless of who takes up the internal market portfolio. The current uproar, written up to the hilt in some British papers, accords Barnier too much power. The forum for the battles will be among MEPs and council of ministers.
As for the man himself, already in conciliatory mode (I am not an ideologue” he said Wednesday. “Everybody needs to calm down.”), he proved to be a ‘European’ Commissioner when he handled the regional portfolio under Romano Prodi. Let’s wait and see what he does on the job this time round.
#1 by Jean-Baptiste Perrin on December 4, 2009 - 10:27 am
I don’t think anybody took Sarkozy’s comments at face value. Everybody knows he talks a lot… but that his words don’t necessary transform into deeds. He is good at amusing the populo, but that’s about it. He should not be taken too seriously.
#2 by Blaat on December 4, 2009 - 11:21 am
Except the British of course heck Sarkozy’s visit to London has even been cancelled.
#3 by Desmond O'Toole on December 4, 2009 - 2:49 pm
The interesting (and not a little disturbing) thing to note here is that British socialists (ahem!!!) are trying to limit and deflect increased regulation of the City of London’s global financial markets while French conservatives are seeking greater regulation.
My, what a topsy-turvy world we live in
Desmond O’Toole
PES activists Dublin
(personal capacity)
#4 by Jean-Baptiste Perrin on December 4, 2009 - 5:48 pm
Well, that’s a French thing: our right wingers are more socialists than most labour parties in Europe. You would be afraid by the level of economics understanding in the French public. Most French simply have zero understanding of the most basic economic concepts.
@Blaat yes I know, but again, this is more to placate what the British have in lieu of a Press. Both governments are probably far less opposed than they say they are. It’s all show.
#5 by Henrik Fugmann on December 4, 2009 - 7:30 pm
As long as we all bow to the British views on financial regulation one thing is given: nothing much will happen.
#6 by Renzino l'Europeo on December 4, 2009 - 10:29 pm
The Parliament is not expected to leave it as the Ministers have agreed upon: the proposal from the Commission was already a minimum standard – as de Laroisière has always said.
And it is the British who should be interested in first place: this financial madness has costed them 850 BILLION pounds already:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/163850bn-official-cost-of-the-bank-bailout-1833830.html
The Italian taxpayer spent ZERO Euro on banks, instead.
#7 by Paul Henri Cadier on December 8, 2009 - 8:17 pm
“Over-regulation” of the City of London will provoke the departure of financial institutions not to Paris or Frankfurt ,but to Singapore, and Hong-Kong. This is likely to happen anyway as Asia will become the nucleus of the world economy by mid-century. The financial institutions that re-locate there will better understand the opportunities of this rising market than those stranded in Europe. Barnier’s appointment will benefit the fat cat bankers that make the move ahead of the curve. The Europeans left behind in London will have to cope with the property slump that the emigtees departure will leave in their wake
#8 by Jean-Baptiste Perrin on December 9, 2009 - 10:39 am
Which could be actually positive for Londoners. The city is way overpriced anyway…