<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MEPs no longer under the spotlight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.euobserver.com/mahony/2009/04/24/meps-no-longer-under-the-spotlight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.euobserver.com/mahony/2009/04/24/meps-no-longer-under-the-spotlight/</link>
	<description>Honor Mahony is editor of the EUobserver in Brussels and has also written for The Irish Times, Sunday Business Post and Spiegel Online. Her blog takes a closer look at political life in Brussels as well as wider trends in the European Union.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:17:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Honor Mahony</title>
		<link>http://blogs.euobserver.com/mahony/2009/04/24/meps-no-longer-under-the-spotlight/comment-page-1/#comment-1034</link>
		<dc:creator>Honor Mahony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.euobserver.com/mahony/?p=208#comment-1034</guid>
		<description>Indeed it is a fair complaint. That is why I included it in the post.  On being encouraged by the other MEPs emailing him, I meant that I was pleased that his work got some recognition, despite one political party lodging a strong enough complaint for him to temporarily close the site. I agree that quantity does not always equal quality but equally I do not see what is wrong with having such a website. It sheds light on the basic activities of MEPs in the European Parliament, something that is not always clear to their voters, and opens up the discussion between voters and their MEP on this very issue. Not altogether a bad thing, I don&#039;t think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed it is a fair complaint. That is why I included it in the post.  On being encouraged by the other MEPs emailing him, I meant that I was pleased that his work got some recognition, despite one political party lodging a strong enough complaint for him to temporarily close the site. I agree that quantity does not always equal quality but equally I do not see what is wrong with having such a website. It sheds light on the basic activities of MEPs in the European Parliament, something that is not always clear to their voters, and opens up the discussion between voters and their MEP on this very issue. Not altogether a bad thing, I don&#8217;t think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://blogs.euobserver.com/mahony/2009/04/24/meps-no-longer-under-the-spotlight/comment-page-1/#comment-1032</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.euobserver.com/mahony/?p=208#comment-1032</guid>
		<description>Seems like a fair complaint - why should members who joined mid-mandate be effectively named and shamed at the bottom of the ranking?

Honor, it seems you are too easily &quot;encouraged&quot; by MEPs who praised the site. No doubt a number of them did disproportionately well out of a ranking based on quantity of work rather than quality. 

Or should we judge you against your EU Observer colleagues by the frequency of your blog posts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like a fair complaint &#8211; why should members who joined mid-mandate be effectively named and shamed at the bottom of the ranking?</p>
<p>Honor, it seems you are too easily &#8220;encouraged&#8221; by MEPs who praised the site. No doubt a number of them did disproportionately well out of a ranking based on quantity of work rather than quality. </p>
<p>Or should we judge you against your EU Observer colleagues by the frequency of your blog posts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michal</title>
		<link>http://blogs.euobserver.com/mahony/2009/04/24/meps-no-longer-under-the-spotlight/comment-page-1/#comment-1016</link>
		<dc:creator>michal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 05:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.euobserver.com/mahony/?p=208#comment-1016</guid>
		<description>The activities of MEPs are here: http://kohovolit.eu/eu/activity.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The activities of MEPs are here: <a href="http://kohovolit.eu/eu/activity.php" rel="nofollow">http://kohovolit.eu/eu/activity.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MEP transparency - Latin-America style, dawg &#171; The conventional wisdom is that in most cases the choice of a link function is largely a matter of taste. This blog is a link function.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.euobserver.com/mahony/2009/04/24/meps-no-longer-under-the-spotlight/comment-page-1/#comment-981</link>
		<dc:creator>MEP transparency - Latin-America style, dawg &#171; The conventional wisdom is that in most cases the choice of a link function is largely a matter of taste. This blog is a link function.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 07:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.euobserver.com/mahony/?p=208#comment-981</guid>
		<description>[...] Started and ended. Could read this. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Started and ended. Could read this. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Topics about Silence-day &#187; Archive &#187; Is he behind? No</title>
		<link>http://blogs.euobserver.com/mahony/2009/04/24/meps-no-longer-under-the-spotlight/comment-page-1/#comment-924</link>
		<dc:creator>Topics about Silence-day &#187; Archive &#187; Is he behind? No</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.euobserver.com/mahony/?p=208#comment-924</guid>
		<description>[...] MEPs no longer under the spotlight « Behind the Scenes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MEPs no longer under the spotlight « Behind the Scenes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Grunwald</title>
		<link>http://blogs.euobserver.com/mahony/2009/04/24/meps-no-longer-under-the-spotlight/comment-page-1/#comment-921</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Grunwald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.euobserver.com/mahony/?p=208#comment-921</guid>
		<description>I certainly can understand his concerns.  But it would be a bit outrageous for an MEP to take any legal action, if this is all publicly available information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly can understand his concerns.  But it would be a bit outrageous for an MEP to take any legal action, if this is all publicly available information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

