French and German politicians of a very different era were on stage at the same time as their current counterparts in the London G20 summit on Thursday. Although this was a smaller stage and in Frankfurt.
A talk to mark the ten year anniversary of the euro reunited former German chancellor Helmut Schmidt and former French president Valéry Giscard d’Estaing.

The British prime minister addresses journalists at the close of the G20 Summit in London
The two men, at the height of their political power between 1974 and 1982/1 respectively, kept the Franco-German engine of the EU well-oiled.
On stage, Schmidt (b. 1918), slumbered in his seat and smoking like a rebellious teenager, resembled a wily old lizard sitting in the sun. Watching online as I was, it looked as though he wasn’t paying a blind bit of attention as European Central Bank chief Jean-Claude Trichet, laid on the compliments thick and fast in his introductory remarks. Giscard (b.1926), you could see, was listening but looked somewhat disdainful.
It was interesting to hear them discuss Europe and its future. They speak in the way of people once in power and of a certain age do, with conviction and the knowledge that while the next generations might be doing them the courtesy of listening to them, they’re going to go ahead and do it their way anyway.
A couple of comments stood out. For me at least. Schmidt said he recalled Jean Monnet’s words while he was travelling to the Frankfurt meeting, that whatever positive or negative factors are decisive in creating the European Union, one condition is absolutely necessary “the close cooperation between the French and Germans.”
If there is no mutual trust between French and German political classes, leaders, governments, “the whole thing cannot work.”
“The present leaders must understand this,” he said. The current leaders Nicolas Sarkozy of France and Angela Merkel of Germany have frosty relations (as did their immediate predecessors), a result both of a clash between flash and down-to-earth styles and of Germany becoming more like a normal EU state – ie bolshy and EU-blaming when it suits them.
As for Giscard, he recalled touring the US before the euro was introduced to explain the process of European monetary union to the Americans. “I was received with absolute scepticism. No one expressed any confidence in the euro,” he said.
The common market would not have survived without it, he noted, with the discussion touching on what the effects of the current economic crisis would have been like without the single currency.
Giscard is still pushing his vision of a more federal Europe. He said he was not sure “how to introduce political will to give [Europe] its final structure” but promised his services if it should ever happen.
“Helmut and I are very happy to join you in 20 years if you come about it,” he joked. Although, as ever with Giscard, I am sure he was entirely serious on this point.
Asked if they ever disagreed on anything while they were leaders, Giscard pointed to Schmidt’s “smoking.” Helmut Schmidt just grinned, then added that they disagreed with Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan.
#1 by Matt West on April 3, 2009 - 5:05 pm
The close cooperation between the French and the Germans mirrors cooperation we are seeing elsewhere. By regulating financial markets and allocating aid, world leaders at the G20 summit in London are laying the foundation for recovery. Despite the suffering that it augers, the global economic crisis is also driving greater international cooperation. For more information go to http://thegreenmarket.blogspot.com/2009/04/g20-lays-foundation-for-better-world.html
#2 by Jon B Lorange on April 4, 2009 - 5:48 pm
Is it then your conclusion due to the current ,,cold” relation between the leaders of France and Germany that we will see a less European integration (i.e. if we take the words of Jean Monnet seriously) ?
#3 by Honor Mahony on April 9, 2009 - 10:43 am
Well my conclusion is that without warm relations between the leaders of France and Germany, all EU decisions are difficult. They cannot swing things their way alone in a Union of 27 member states, of course, but if Paris and Berlin are not working in tandem, nothing much happens either.
What I found most interesting about the Schmidt/Giscard discussion is the sense of moral responsibility they both feel for the EU as politicians whose formative years (late teenage/early 20s) were shaped by World War II. This generation of leaders, I would argue, are not conscious of the legacy of the War to the same extent so they do not have the same moral relationship with the EU project.
This is a natural result of the passing years but it does mean a more public willingness, particularly on the part the German government, that short-term national concerns matter more than the EU good.
When the ‘engine’ of the EU believes this is acceptable, then there is not much incentive for others to rise above the national view either. (apologies for taking forever to reply).
#4 by Cellphone Forum on July 14, 2009 - 12:20 am
I believe that if there is no mutual trust between French and German political classes, leaders, governments, “the whole thing cannot work
#5 by Gary Cockinaras on July 21, 2009 - 3:32 am
Valery Giscard d’Estaing & Helmut Schmidt were both outstanding people as well as politicians & ,in reality, should have served their respective nations for a longer period.
In the case of Giscard, he was turfed out by a then ungrateful, uncaring French Nation in 1981when he was still only 55 years of age.
Helmut Schmidt’s governing coalition of Social Democrats & Free Democrats, which he headed, unfortunately collapsed near the end of 1982. At that time Schmidt was approaching 64 years of age, with plenty of energy & vigour still in him.