“Media and politics – the tension between freedom of the press and personal rights in print media and the internet”. Monday November 9th, 18.30, Residence Palace, Brussels – se invitation at the bottom of this blog entry.
Can only Norwegian media report about the British parliament? For one absurd day exactly that appears to have been the case last month, when the Guardian was gagged to report about a certain company by a court injunction. Norwegians colleagues were threatened with legal steps but published in Norway and online about the story. A unique cross-border coopearation of colleagues from the Guardian, BBC, Volkskrant and NRK.
Earlier this year in Brussels a German liberal member of the European Parliament, who wanted to be re-elected, systematically approached media with threats to withhold one certain information: Her attendance figures in the previous period. What caused the politician to act, as she did, is not known. But her lawyer did get a temporary injunction against the important German daily FAZ, she tried to stop parts of an interview in German public service tv ARD, she tried to stop Brussels journalist and blogger Hajo Friedrich and she tried to stop German journalist and blogger David Schraven of Ruhrbarone. Her various actions were reported by German media magazine Zapp.
In Italy sueing journalists appears to be near normal. According to Italian MEP Mario Mauro from the first of January 1994 till 2009 6.745 penal and civil cases have been announced against press and tv. The average is 449 yearly, more than one a day.
Slovenia has accused Finnish journalist Magnus Berglund, who researched and aired a story about alleged corruption in an arms deal between Finnish company Patria and Slovenia. Finnish police is currently investigating the case.
Going furhter south from Slovenia to EU applicant countries in the Balkans, the situation gets even worse. Croatian journalist Hrvoje Appelt – currently under police protection – has started to gather information about assaults against journalists in his own country and the neighbouring countries. Do run his overview over assaults against journalists through Google translate – it is saddening reading.
When Reporters Sans Frontieres recently published its annual index of press freedom, the conclusion read “Europe continues to recede”.
“Europe should be setting an example as regards civil liberties. How can you condemn human rights violations abroad if you do not behave irreproachably at home?” Thus reads the text of the press freedom watchers.
Coming Monday one step is taken to address at least one of the aspects. Journalists have invited politicians and lawyers to talk about the issue with each other in Brussels.
„Media and politics – the tension between freedom of the press and personal rights in print media and the internet“
Experts on the panel and in the audience discuss in German and English (simultaneous translation provided)
in the Residence Palace, Brussels, Rue de la Loi 155, Room Polak
on Monday 9 November 2009,
18.30 Welcome drinks
19.00 – 20.30 Panel discussion
On the Panel:
Philippe Leruth (Vice-President of the European Federation of Journalists, EFJ), Klaus-Heiner Lehne (MEP (PPE) and Chairman of the Legal Affairs Committee in the European Parliament), David Schraven (Freelance Jounalist and Blogger of the German website „Ruhrbarone“), Martin Huff (Journalist and Lawyer, Director of the Local Bar of Cologne), Eberhard Kempf (Lawyer, German Bar Association) and Gregor Kreuzhuber (Partner, GPlus-Communications Consultancy; Brussels)
Chair:
Hajo Friedrich (freelance journalist).
Manifold are the tensions between media and the people in the focus of media coverage. More and more often political reporting in print media and the internet is subject to – often costly – litigation in court. According to the Italian MEP Mario Mauro politicians in Italy have brought 6745 civil and criminal proceedings against media coverage since 1994. Also German MEPs have in the past filed law suits against the press.
In most cases there is a conflict between freedom of the press and personal rights, between journalists who investigate and politicians who feel pilloried. A new development seems to be that top politicians and other prominent figures take legal action against media reports even beyond national borders as with the World Wide Web print media have increased their sphere of influence enormously. In this regard the „internal market“ of the World Wide Web already has difficulties to respond to the question which national law and which court of jurisdiction are applicable.
Beyond identifying the essential issues in view of the above-mentioned tensions the panellists – together with the audience – will seek to find morals, answers and compromise solutions. For the first time the panel discussion will bring together representatives of almost all involved parties in Brussels: journalists and their lobbyists, lawyers, politicians, media and public affairs consultants.
The discussion will be in English and German (simultaneous translation German/English and vice versa will be available). Drinks & Snacks will be provided.
#1 by al on November 5, 2009 - 2:33 pm
Best of luck, but I’m sad to say that you will all get nowhere. The EU’s moving closer and closer to media state control. Not like there wasn’t any advance warning…
#2 by damien on November 5, 2009 - 10:42 pm
It would be interesting to know if any member state whom is overly zealous in trying to prosecuate a journalist from another member state has used the European Arrest Warrant.
#3 by Hajo Friedrich on November 5, 2009 - 11:53 pm
Damien,
good question – hope to get an answer on monday on this kind of ‘juridical cooperation’.
#4 by Jean-Baptiste Perrin on November 6, 2009 - 10:12 am
@ damien, as far as I know it has not been the case, yet, because EAW are reserved to criminal cases. The prosecution of press and journalists we are talking about right now are civil cases (defamation and libel).
#5 by Jean-Baptiste Perrin on November 6, 2009 - 10:16 am
This said, the facts are there and absolutely not only in the EU, it is a worrying and global phenomenon. And the behavior of some MEP’s is a sad example indeed. Even sadder that said MEP is a member of the liberal group, which precisely is supposed to support freedom of press more than others. Last but not least, I would like to remind people around here that it is still mostly a purely member-state related issue, with the two major exceptions mentioned in Brigitte’s post.
#6 by damien on November 6, 2009 - 11:22 am
@ Jean-Baptiste,
At least that is some comfort, however, I would ask, how many side issues of a civil case can be turned into a criminal case………contempt of court, ‘obtaining information (state secrets and the like’ ‘anti-terrorism laws’ etc
Or what if a journalist exercised their right of free speech with happened to upset a few people in another state, would that state prevent on public safety grounds the right of that journalist to visit that state for a university debate for example?
Remember Damien Greene MP in the UK? Or the Dutch MP prevented from entering the UK?
#7 by damien on November 6, 2009 - 11:25 am
I recall it was our very own FF MEPs, members of ALDE, which voted/abstained in the most illiberal fashion.
I don’t blame FF, did ALDE HQ in Brussels not know who they were getting into bed with.
#8 by Jean-Baptiste Perrin on November 6, 2009 - 1:54 pm
@ Damien, do you know if Dutch D66 MEP voted with the rest on this issue, by the way?
Also, I tend to agree with you on the Gert Wilders visit. Although Wilders is an absolute nuisance, I strongly agree that he should be allowed to utter his insanities in any way he likes and anywhere he likes, as long as he doesn’t call for the murder of anyone. I would also agree that in this case, tax payers should not be forced to pay for his special protection.
#9 by Blaat on November 6, 2009 - 6:02 pm
@Jean-Baptiste I suggest checking http://www.votewatch.eu to see whether or not your MEP/party voted for or against an issue. To save you some time I believe this is the media freedom in Italy vote: http://www.votewatch.eu/cx_vote_details.php?id_act=104#
#10 by Ulrich on November 9, 2009 - 11:36 am
@ Brigitte’s article
@ #5 by Jean-Baptiste Perrin
So far as I know, the initial reason for this “German liberal member of the European Parliament” was the objective incorrectness of the attendance figures initially used. This then triggered a whole process of measures and countermeasures, which would all have been unnecessary, if the figures had been checked correctly prior to publication. This basic fact then became secondary and “threatening the press” became the main issue.
In conclusion, I do not think that this is a convincing example for showing that the freedoms of the press are not being respected.
#11 by martin on November 11, 2009 - 6:44 pm
I would like to send some material to inform this subject.
Is there a contact email?